20 Railroad Lawsuit Blood Cancer Websites That Are Taking The Internet By Storm

· 4 min read
20 Railroad Lawsuit Blood Cancer Websites That Are Taking The Internet By Storm

Colon Cancer Caused by Railroad Work

Regular exposure to hazardous chemicals is a common occurrence for railroad workers.  wasatch railroad contractors lawsuit  has been proven to cause a variety of cancers and other serious ailments.

For example asbestos and diesel exhaust have been linked to colon cancer. Exposure to certain metal-working fluids and pesticides, along with solvents can increase the colon cancer risk.

Exposures

It doesn't matter if they are unloading or loading chemicals or cleaning up spills, breathing diesel exhaust or using various solvents, railroad workers are exposed to harmful substances while performing their job. Many of carcinogens are linked to cancer and other chronic health conditions. Present and former railroad workers who suffer from cancer or other chronic illnesses are eligible for compensation under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA).

For instance, the widow of a retired railroad worker claimed that her husband's death from asbestos-related stomach cancer was due to his job as a worker for CSX Transportation Inc. She asserts that CSX was not able to provide adequate protection equipment to prevent the worker from inhaling asbestos fibres during washing, sanding or painting materials that contained the deadly substance.

A second FELA claim concerns railroad workers who are exposed to coal dust and other harmful agents while at work. These chemicals can cause leukemia, blood cancers and lung diseases.



The chemical benzene is toxic that is present in many products used by railroads, such as fuel and different solvents. Studies have linked benzene with various cancers, like colon cancer. A lawyer for railroad cancer will determine if the disease you're suffering from was triggered through exposure to toxic chemicals at work and submit a claim on your behalf. Federal law limits your time to file claims. It is therefore essential to consult an attorney as soon as possible.

Diagnosis

Rail workers are exposed to toxic fumes and chemicals while on the job. Welding fumes and asbestos diesel exhaust, as well as herbicides such as Imazethapyr or dicamba can all cause colon cancer. Railroad workers who suffer from an illness that is related to their job could be eligible for compensation through an action under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA).

An experienced railroad injury attorney can help you pursue this claim. FELA was adopted in 1908 and requires railroads to compensate employees for injuries incurred during work. This includes injuries like a cancer diagnosis, and it can offer an enormous amount of compensation.

A widow in Illinois filed a lawsuit against CSX Transportation Inc. at the end of 2016, claiming the company did not take the safety measures necessary to protect her husband's stomach cancer, which later metastasized into colon cancer. Ruth Frieson claims that her husband died from cancer after being exposed to toxins and asbestos at work. During the trial, jurors heard expert testimony from two doctors of rehabilitative medicine as well as industrial hygiene specialists, as well as from plaintiff's wife and his medical oncologist, who claimed that exposure to asbestos, diesel exhaust, and a lifetime of smoking caused his cancer. The jury pronounced a verdict in favor of the railroad defendant, after only a little over three hours.

Treatment

If you've been diagnosed with colon cancer due to your railroad work, it is important to seek legal representation now. Under the Federal Employers Liability Act, railroad workers who have been injured may bring a lawsuit within three years from the date of their diagnosis.

Depending on how your cancer was diagnosed, there may be a number of complexities in filing a lawsuit against railroads. In some cases, it can be difficult to pinpoint exactly the time when toxic exposure occurred since many of these chemicals have a lengthy half-life.

The jury will take into consideration a variety of aspects when determining the amount of compensation you can receive in the event of an injury. This includes loss of income, medical expenses and the suffering and pain you've endured. If your loved one has died due to their injuries, you may also be in the position of being entitled to damages for wrongful deaths.

In a recent incident, an ex-railroad worker claimed that the cancer he developed was due to his constant exposure on the job to diesel exhaust, asbestos, and other toxic chemicals. The railroads did not comply with FELA safety regulations. However, the court decided that the plaintiff had not conducted a "reasonably diligent" search for information about his disease. The jury concluded that he did not have sufficient evidence to prove his claim.

Damages

Railroad workers and residents close to railyards may be exposed to toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, such as asbestos and diesel exhaust. Our Houston railroad exposure lawyer can help you get compensation if you contracted illnesses caused by this exposure. You could also be entitled to compensation for the cost of lost wages and expenses for caregivers. In addition, you may be able to pursue damages for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment life, emotional distress, and many more.

Our firm secured a defense jury verdict in the Federal Employers' Liability Act case on behalf of an railroad client. The plaintiff alleged that he contracted Hodgkin's lymphoma and kidney cancer as a result of occupational exposure to creosote, diesel exhaust, and other toxic substances when working on the railroad as a locomotive engineer. After less than an hour of deliberation the jury returned a defense verdict.

In another FELA case the lawyers of our firm won a summary judgment on behalf of the railroad defendant in a suit filed by an ex-train conductor of freight trains. The suit claimed that he contracted lung cancer due to his job on the railroad and was triggered by exposure to asbestos and other toxic substances. We were of the opinion that the claim was not barred by an earlier release agreement that was signed in connection with the settlement of an earlier asbestos lawsuit.